Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203112134.g2BLYss16831@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS (Jan Wieck <janwieck@yahoo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS
Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Jan Wieck wrote: > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > Greg Copeland wrote: > > > > Checking application/pgp-signature: FAILURE > > -- Start of PGP signed section. > > > I'm looking through the index code and just happened to notice that > > > INDEX_MAX_KEYS is currently set to 16. It there a reason for this value > > > to be at 16 or was it arbitrarily specified? > > > > Arbitrary, and there is discussion about increasing it. > > Wasn't it that this number had to be <= the maximum number of > function args? Yes, they are related. At least I think so. Anyway, the parameter that needs increasing is max function args. I got mixed up there. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: