Re: Index USING in pg_dump
От | nconway@klamath.dyndns.org (Neil Conway) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Index USING in pg_dump |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020308170102.GB11937@klamath.dyndns.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Index USING in pg_dump (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Index USING in pg_dump
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Mar 08, 2002 at 11:07:57AM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Tom Lane wrote: > > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > > This is possible because btree is the default. TODO item is: > > > * Remove USING clause from pg_get_indexdef() if index is btree (Bruce) > > > > I do not think this is necessary or helpful. The only possible > > reason to change it would be if we thought btree might someday > > not be the default index type --- but no such change is on the > > horizon. And if one was, you've just embedded special knowledge > > about btree in yet one more place... > > Yes, but it doesn't look like the way they created it. Why is this relevant? > Very few use > USING in there queries. Why show it in pg_dump output? I agree with Tom: this seems like a waste of time, and may even be worse than the current pg_dump output. The type of the index is "btree"; by assuming that Pg happens to default to "btree", you're just making the process of index restoration more fragile. Cheers, Neil -- Neil Conway <neilconway@rogers.com> PGP Key ID: DB3C29FC
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: