Re: Mandrake RPMs rebuilt
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Mandrake RPMs rebuilt |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203061602.LAA19266@www.wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Mandrake RPMs rebuilt (Thomas Lockhart <thomas@fourpalms.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Mandrake RPMs rebuilt
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 06 March 2002 10:42 am, Thomas Lockhart wrote: > with one additional RPM built for the python "mx" package. > The postgresql RPMs themselves are built using the same spec file as > used by Lamar for the RH RPMS. The mx RPM is massaged from the RH source > RPM to remove gratuitous RH-isms and to remove references to the > Distutils package, which on Mandrake is included in the normal python > packages. Thank you, Thomas. I try to nix RedHatisms from my spec -- it is not always possible since I only run RedHat on my Intel machines (I run SuSE 7.3 on my UltraSPARC, but have not had time to work on SuSEifying the 7.2 set yet), and I don't always know what the RedHatisms are. Back in the 7.0.x days I found a number of RedHatisms while putting together GreatBridge's RPMsets, but that knowledge isn't as applicable today as it was then. I do know that Mandrake is just as guilty in applying 'Mandrakisms' -- but at least they are documented. :-) It does make it difficult to maintain a 'generic' RPM..... Speaking of, I may be able to get another release out this week to fix some problems that have been brought to my attention. We'll see how I recuperate from my last 18 16-hour days..... (18 _consecutive_ days.....) I'll look at your mx RPM's spec and compare to RedHat's -- if a finer grained dependency can be determined, then we can go that route, as the eGenix mx stuff goes by more names than just 'mx'. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: