Re: Do we still have locking problems with concurrent users

> > > Does anyone have any ideas?  If not, would someone be willing to take
> > > the time to fix it?
> > 
> > It has not been fixed.  One TODO item is to either stop mentioning hash
> > at all or get it improved.  We have been sitting on the fence for too
> > long.
> 
> I'll be working on fixing this. I'm also going to try to add more
> features to the hash index implementation: for example, allow UNIQUE
> hash indexes, hash indexes over multiple keys, etc. My first improvement
> to the hash code, replacing the hash function with a better one, is on
> the unapplied patches list and should be in CVS soon. Bruce, can you add
> my name to the TODO list next to this item?

TODO updated.  Done.
--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026