Re: Vacuum daemon (pgvacuumd ?)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Vacuum daemon (pgvacuumd ?) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203060301.g2631kP19379@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Vacuum daemon (pgvacuumd ?) (mlw <markw@mohawksoft.com>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Is the number of deleted tuples sufficient to decide priority on vacuum? My > thinking is that the tables with the most deleted tuples is the table which > need most vacuum. Should ratio of deleted tuples vs total tuples or just count > of deleted tuples. I am thinking ratio, but maybe it need be tunable. Deleted or updated. Both expire tuples. Also, the old tuples can't be vacuumed until no other transaction is viewing them as active. > (4) If the tables eligible to be vacuumed have deleted tuples which exceed > acceptable limits, vacuum them. Seems you will measure in percentages, right? -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: