Re: Help with SET TRANSACTION in a function
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Help with SET TRANSACTION in a function |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020304200323.B85567-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Help with SET TRANSACTION in a function ("otisg" <otisg@iVillage.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Mon, 4 Mar 2002, otisg wrote: > Hello, > > From: Stephan Szabo > > On 28 Feb 2002, OtisUsenet wrote: > > > > I was wondering if anyone here can help. I could not get any help on > > pgsql-sql nor pgsql-general mailing lists. > > > > > I'm having trouble getting functions with SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION > > ... to parse. > > > > Without nested transactions, you're not going to have any luck I > think. > > First of all the extra begin/end in the function are not allowed and > > IIRC, set transaction isolation level must be the first statement of > the > > transaction which it won't be since the enclosing transaction will > have > > started the select simple_fun(). > > Hello, > > If I understand it correctly the function should then look like this: > > CREATE FUNCTION simple_fun() RETURNS INTEGER AS ' > SET TRANSACTION ISOLATION LEVEL SERIALIZABLE > BEGIN > RETURN 1; > END; > ' LANGUAGE 'plpgsql'; Only declarations go outside the begin. As far as I can see, you really just can't put a set transaction isolation level in a function and expect it to work. If PostgreSQL had nested transactions you could presumably do it then, but it doesn't.
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: