Re: elog() patch

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I will add a new symbol INFOFORCE which will always be sent to the
> > client no matter what the client_min_messages level.
> 
> I was thinking along the same lines, but I hate that name.
> INFOALWAYS maybe?

Love it.  :-)  Sounds like a song.  Info-always on my mind, ...

> Also, should it be different from INFO as far as the server log
> goes?  Not sure.

No, I think we add too much confusion doing that.  It should behave like
info to the server or we have to add an additional server_min_messages
level.  My feeling is that they would want INFOALWAYS in server logs in
the same cases they would want INFO.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026