Re: elog() patch
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: elog() patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200203040252.g242qq108185@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: elog() patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: elog() patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > "Rod Taylor" <rbt@zort.ca> writes: > > EXPLAIN would come out as INFO would it not? > > If we make it INFO it won't come out at all, at the message level that > a lot of more-advanced users will prefer to use. That's no solution. Well, right now it is INFO. It is certainly not a notice/warning or error. Seems we will have to address this. Let me look at the existing INFO message and see if there are any others that _have_ to be emitted. I will add a new symbol INFOFORCE which will always be sent to the client no matter what the client_min_messages level. Seems this is the only good way to fix this. Even if we make that NOTICE/WARNING, people may turn that off too. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: