Re: elog() patch

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> ...
> > My take was to have WARNING and NOTICE, yours is WARNING and INFO ?
> > For me INFO is also better to understand than NOTICE.
> > Not sure that alone is worth the change though, since lots of
> > clients will currently parse "NOTICE".
> 
> fwiw, I find the connotations of these terms to be, in increasing order
> of severity:
> 
>   INFO, NOTICE, WARNING
> 
> though the distinction between INFO and NOTICE is not so great that one
> absolutely could not replace the other.

Yes, that was my thought to.  I am not sure we have any need for NOTICE
when we have INFO and WARNING.  The NOTICE sort of kept both meanings,
and we don't need that anymore.

On a humorous note, when we got the code from Berkeley, WARN was the
original tag to error out a query.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026