Re: 7.2 stuff
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.2 stuff |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020224233637.V71877-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.2 stuff (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, 24 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes: > > * ALTER TABLE DROP PRIMARY KEY > > - Done, will need review > > * ALTER TABLE DROP UNIQUE > > - Done, will need review > > > I'll dredge this up again if I can. All it does is add a standards > > compliant alternative syntax for dropping those constraints. Tom - can you > > just do this in the parser, like you did it for the ADD constraints??? > > I don't foresee it falling out of other parser work, if that's what you > mean. If you want it done in the parser you'll have to do it yourself. > > There are some semantic issues, eg: what does it mean to do ALTER TABLE > DROP PRIMARY KEY in an inheritance hierarchy? Does every child lose its > primary key (if any), even if it's not inherited from the parent? Apart from the fact that currently pkeys don't inherit, does it make sense that the child can have a separate primary key since it should really be inheriting from the parent and you can't have two, right?
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: