Re: elog() proposal

> Oh, now I get the point: you want to not pick up debug-level messages
> for translation at all.  That makes sense.  Okay, how about we take
> the names Bruce was proposing and make them function names:
> 
>     PGLog(msg, ...)
>     PGError(msg, ...)
>     PGCrash(msg, ...)

OK, so elog(ERROR, ...) and PGError(msg, ...) would be the same.  Makes
sense.  Should we consider hiding these in macros so they really still
call elog(ERROR, ...) for backward compatiblity?

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026