Re: Does iscachable work?
От | Jeff Eckermann |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Does iscachable work? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020222231311.78329.qmail@web20802.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Does iscachable work? (root <ffabrizio@exchange.webmd.net>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
If "entityid" has a lot of unique values, you won't get much gain from caching. My experience is that the gain can be stunning in cases where there are few distinct values in a column. The best way to know the benefit in a given case is to test it. If your function is highly computation-intensive, or (for example) makes selects against the database that require full table scans, then you will see slow results no matter what. --- root <ffabrizio@exchange.webmd.net> wrote: > > Hello, > > I'm running PostgreSQL 7.1.3, and I have a query > that uses one of my > functions: > > select findregion(entityid) from msg200; > > The findregion function is set to be 'with > (iscachable)'. However, the > query takes upwards of 40 seconds to run, > consistently. The table only > has 20000 rows or so. It doesn't seem like the > caching is working. > > The only other time I tried to use function results > caching, it actually > consistently increased my execution time. Anything > I need to be doing > differently? > > Thanks, > Fran > > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? > > http://archives.postgresql.org __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Yahoo! Sports - Coverage of the 2002 Olympic Games http://sports.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: