Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200202221830.g1MIU7a02183@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: point in time recovery and moving datafiles online ("Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD" <ZeugswetterA@spardat.at>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Zeugswetter Andreas SB SD wrote: > > > Yes. But I think you might have to avoid "vacuum full" during data file backup. > > > > Why? If vacuum is unsafe in this scenario, wouldn't it also be unsafe > > in event of a system crash? > > I was not sure we are 100% crash safe during "vacuum full". > But yes, now recalling your last remark on a crash during vacuum full > I guess we should be. > > > I do believe that vacuum should (but presently does not) emit a WAL > > record showing its truncation of the file, so that the equivalent > > truncation can be repeated during replay. > > > However, this is needed in any case. > > I see, but it has only the effect of not freeing the space to the OS, > so it is not really a bug ? Next vacuum will do it anyway. One idea is that replication can give is point-in-time recovery. A recovery is nothing more than a replication slave taking the last full backup and reading the replication traffic to get itself up to date. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: