Re: elog() proposal

On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 09:54:51PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> I just submitted a patch to fix various elog() issues.  I have two
> additional proposals.
> 
> First, I think ERROR/DEBUG/NOTICE/FATAL, etc are too generic and cause
> compile problems/warnings, especially with Perl.  I suggest renaming all
> elog levels to PG*, so it would be PGERROR and PGINFO.  We could also do
> E_* or E*.  I am interested in other opinions.
You forgot PG_* :-)
> Second, I propose adding two GUC variables that control how much elog()
> info is sent to the server and client logs.  I suggest
> 'server_message_min' with possible values DEBUG, LOG, NOTICE, ERROR,
> FATAL, CRASH; and 'client_message_min' with possible values INFO,
> NOTICE, ERROR, FATAL, CRASH.
IMHO stop an example NOTICE by "SET NOTICE TO 'OFF'" is better and more common way than current the only one way in
libpqand PQsetNoticeProcessor.
 
       Karel

-- Karel Zak  <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz,
http://mape.jcu.cz