Re: License question
| От | Marc G. Fournier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: License question |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20020215111817.S86207-100000@mail1.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | License question (Turbo Fredriksson <turbo@bayour.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
go to town :) On 15 Feb 2002, Turbo Fredriksson wrote: > I just got a question originating from our lawyers at work, concerning > the usage of 'free software' in our product. > > The product (currently) consists of a modified Redhat 7.1 distribution, > PostgreSQL 7.1.3 (in custom RPM packages) and some proprietary softwares. > > I read the license, and saw this paragraph: > > use, copy, modify, and distribute this software and its > documentation for any purpose, without fee, and without > a written agreement is hereby granted > > We're charging for the SYSTEM (ie, hardware and software combination) > which contains and have PostgreSQL as a fundamental part of the whole > system and function. > > We're not charging SPECIFICALLY for PostgreSQL, but for a complete, working > setup... Is this in conformance with the PostgreSQL license...? > > > Ortega counter-intelligence pits security Treasury Serbian smuggle > Mossad [Hello to all my fans in domestic surveillance] Delta Force > iodine South Africa Marxist Nazi tritium > [See http://www.aclu.org/echelonwatch/index.html for more about this] > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate > subscribe-nomail command to majordomo@postgresql.org so that your > message can get through to the mailing list cleanly >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: