Re: "Bug" in statistics for v7.2?
От | Marc G. Fournier |
---|---|
Тема | Re: "Bug" in statistics for v7.2? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20020213121458.H19107-100000@mail1.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | "Bug" in statistics for v7.2? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
That explains it ... profiles_faith | count ----------------+-------- 0 | 485938 1 | 2 2 | 6 7 | 2 8 | 21 (5 rows) Cool, another waste of space *sigh* thanks ... On Wed, 13 Feb 2002, Tom Lane wrote: > "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org> writes: > > Okay, if I'm understanding pg_stats at all, which I may not be, n_distinct > > should represent # of distinct values in that row, no? > > But, I have one field that has 5 distinct values: > > But pg_stats is reporting 1: > > The pg_stats values are only, um, statistical. If 99.9% of the table is > the same value and the other four values appear only once or twice, it's > certainly possible for ANALYZE's sample to include only the common value > and miss the rare ones. AFAIK that will not break anything; if you have > an example where the planner seems to be fooled because of this, let's > see it. > > regards, tom lane >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: