Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200202070228.SAA15249@mail.ucsd.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server (Haroldo Stenger <hstenger@adinet.com.uy>) |
Ответы |
Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Let's make a pro cons list of thread related aspectcs here. We saw a lot of > cons. Write some pros explicitely. We're not in a hurry anyway. I think in addition to pros/cons, an important question is: How has threading influenced other DBMS's? I know MySQL uses threading, at least in the development version; how much has it helped? Is the utility of a database based partly on the presence of threading? Take Oracle, MsSQL, and others; which have threading and which seem to gain from threading? I don't follow the other DB's as closely, so I don't know the answers. I suspect that looking at other databases will give us a clue about the magnitude of the pros, rather than just the areas of influence. Regards,Jeff
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: