Re: Comparision of DBs (new to list)
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Comparision of DBs (new to list) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200202040353.TAA13890@mail.ucsd.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Comparision of DBs (new to list) ("Kym Farnik" <kym@recalldesign.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Comparision of DBs (new to list)
Re: Comparision of DBs (new to list) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> Q: Is there a product comparison matrix (either static or > like crash-me at MySQL)? > http://www.mysql.com/information/crash-me.php > > I would like to compare: > PostgreSQL 7.1, M$ SQL Server 7+ and Oracle 9i. I haven't found exact comparisons either. They are good to get a general idea about the capabilites if you would just like a starting place, however I would not use solely such a comparison for an important decision. One problem I found with mysql's crashme is that it was somewhat misleading. By that I don't mean to say that the mysql team has intentionally distorted anything. What I mean is that it is quite hard to measure exact feature translations from different databases. For example, mysql (an I believe mssql) uses "auto_increment" to assign a number to a record automatically. PostgreSQL uses sequences, which are a different approach that can accomplish the same goal. I don't think that the mysql crashme recognizes that postgres can accomplish this task, since it can't be accomplished in the same exact way. So, for a real comparison, read some documentation about each database, and determine how/if you could implement your required features in each. After that, of course, you can see if a database seems to be more stable or faster or easier to work with than another that met your requirements. You can also always ask a mailing list how you accomplish a given task in their respective database, and see if you like it more/less than another database. Of course, all this testing & experimentation is much cheaper with a free database like postgres. Regards, Jeff
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: