Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released)
От | Lamar Owen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201290348.WAA32225@www.wgcr.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released) (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: 7.2 RPMs (Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL v7.2rc2 Released)
|
Список | pgsql-ports |
On Monday 28 January 2002 07:29 pm, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > Lamar Owen writes: > > Pre-release RPMS are available for this release candidate at > > ftp://ftp.postgresql.org/pub/binary/beta/RPMS > * Still way old JDBC drivers in there. Yes. I still haven't gotten a good answer as to a good development environment for the java build. > * You're defining PGLIB in the bash profile. PGLIB doesn't do anything. As of? > * postgresql.init: > Why do you need networking for postmaster? Legacy. Shouldn't be an issue now as long as TCP/IP listening isn't on -- but then again, I don't know that, thus I have to make sure networking is up in case it is. If there is a clean solution to this, then that would be a good thing. > Using `pidof postmaster` is wrong. There could be other postmasters > running just fine. Should use the lock file, or not care because the > postmaster or pg_ctl can handle this just fine. In this RPM incarnation there is the assumption that only one postmaster is running. This will change once multiple config files are easier.... :-) > Might want to implement the "reload" option. > * What happened to the contrib handling patch? > * What is going to happen to NLS? It's going to be integrated, if I can remember to apply the patch you sent. I would appreciate patches against the current release as opposed to your personal development spec file. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
В списке pgsql-ports по дате отправления: