Re: Moving my business to PostgreSQL
От | Jeff Davis |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Moving my business to PostgreSQL |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201281028.CAA10811@mail.ucsd.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Moving my business to PostgreSQL ("Jason Watkins" <jason_watkins@pobox.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Sunday 27 January 2002 10:20 pm, you wrote: > This post is long, if you'd like to offer quick point advice, I specificly > am looking for live replication/fallover for PostgreSQL, daily > synchronization with Access, and data import/restructuring from the D3 > nested relational database to PostgreSQL. > Sorry I can't answer too many of your questions, but one thing I am quite sure of is that Postgres does not offer replication/failover. I inferred this information from the postgres developer TODO (http://developer.postgresql.org/todo.php), which still lists both features (and has for some time, I might add). I really think that postgres is a great database; it certainly has many advanced features, and is also developing quite rapidly. However, it sounds as though it doesn't have every capability you require. Replication/failover seem important to what you're doing, and unless I'm mistaken, they don't exist in postgres. You may be able to make use of what work has been done in that regard. I guess the question now is: Is there something out there that does meet your requirements? Postgres may be your best bet if you can't afford the costs associated with oracle. Oracle may be best if the replication/failover really is a requirement. Or maybe you can find a cheaper commercial database that offers more of what you need than postgres. Note that my experience is somewhat limited, so don't take what I say for fact. Regards, and good luck, Jeff
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: