Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201242335.g0ONZCi03725@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: 7.1 vs. 7.2 on AIX 5L (Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Added to TODO: * Evaluate AIX cs() spinlock macro for performance optimizations (Tatsuo) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Tatsuo Ishii wrote: > > > NOTICE: LockRelease: no such lock > > > > > > I'm afraid now the locking is broken. Will look into more. > > > > Next try would be _check_lock (found in sys/atomic_op.h): > > > > Description (from man page) > > > > The _check_lock subroutine performs an atomic (uninterruptible) sequence of > > operations. The compare_and_swap subroutine is similar, but does not issue > > synchronization instructions and therefore is inappropriate for updating lock > > words. > > > > replace the TAS define with: > > #define TAS(lock) _check_lock(lock, 0, 1) > > > > > with LinuxPPC asm: 2m9.340s > > > with cs: 10m11.15s > > > with fetch_and_or: 3m55.19s > > > > with _check_lock: 3m29.990s > > > > I think that the culprit may also be the S_UNLOCK (use _clear_lock) ? > > Thanks. I will try with it. > > BTW, I'm still wondering why 7.2 is slower than 7.1 on AIX. Tom said > cs() is responsible for that. But not only 7.2 but 7.1 uses cs(). It > seems cs() does not explain the difference of the performance. > -- > Tatsuo Ishii > > ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster > -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: