Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201181702.g0IH2Vt20652@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Bug in pg_dump/restore -o
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Philip Warner wrote: > >> Here's a patch that seems to do the trick. It may seem large, but it is > >> primarily a reorganization of existing code in pg_backup_db.c to make the > >> code a little clearer and to facilitate the swapping around of some loops. > > > I hate to say it but I think this is too risky for 7.2. > > It does seem a rather large diff ... however, if I understand it right, > what Philip has done here is to hack pg_restore so that it will do the > right thing with an unmodified 7.1 dump file. This is much superior to > hacking pg_dump to change the emitted dump data. Weren't you telling me > that we might need a solution for someone who had already done pg_dump > -o -Ft and then wiped their 7.1 database? > > I think we should scrutinize this as carefully as we can, but apply it > if at all possible. Interesting solution. I defer to your opinion on this. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: