Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201180512.g0I5CNt16482@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: tuptoaster.c must *not* use SnapshotAny
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > Agreed. I think that was the reason we kept TOAST and large objects, > > because large objects were designed for random read-write. If we can > > get large objects to auto-delete, probably with pg_depend, we can then > > use them seamlessly with BLOB I/O routines. > > Oops I seem to have missed the discussion about excluding > bytea from the candidate from BLOB. Yes now we seem to have > a good reason to exclude existent type from the candidate > of BLOB. Well, we had the discussion when Jan was adding TOAST, and Jan was saying we still need large objects for I/O purposes and for very large items. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: