Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist
От | Jan Wieck |
---|---|
Тема | Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201152124.g0FLOVS28969@saturn.janwieck.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: FATAL 1: Relation 'pg_shadow' does not exist
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Gavin Sherry <swm@linuxworld.com.au> writes: > > When I first brought it down, I attempted this, but forgot -O. I've just > > done this, however, it connected fine. Moreover, a select * from > > pg_shadow; returned results! I vacuumed and brought the database back > > online -- everything fine. > > > Extremely strange =\. > > Did I read you correctly to say that you're still on 7.1? > > This episode should convince you to update to 7.1.3, pronto. > We don't make dot-releases for amusement value. > > (No, I can't cite any particular bug that might've led to this.) IIRC there was this cross DB shared buffer usage bug somewhere in 7.1, that used blocks from another DB found by accident in the cache. So it all must have been a cache problem and the postmaster restart fix^H^H^H made it disappear and lurk again. That bug can corrupt the system catalogs of all your databases! Upgrade NOW! Jan -- #======================================================================# # It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. # # Let's break this rule - forgive me. # #================================================== JanWieck@Yahoo.com # _________________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: