Re: [HACKERS] Updated TODO item

Thomas Lockhart wrote:
> > > > * Make it easier to create a database owned by someone who can't createdb,
> > > >   perhaps CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH USER = "user"
> > > CREATE DATABASE dbname WITH OWNER = "user"
> > A much better idea. There is no conflict in using OWNER here.
>
> Does this have the multiple "WITH xxx" clauses which were discussed
> earlier? That is a nonstarter for syntax. There are other places in the
> grammar having "with clauses" and multiple arguments or subclauses, and
> having the shift/reduce issues resolved...

Not sure.  Patch is at:

    http://candle.pha.pa.us/cgi-bin/pgpatches2

Are you asking if it has "WITH ARG val, ARG val" or "WITH ARG val WITH
ARG val?"

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026