Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 200201040446.g044k4a21125@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > OK, so now we know that while the new lock code handles the select(1) > > problem better, we also know that on AIX the old select(1) code wasn't > > as bad as we thought. > > It still seems that the select() blocking method should be a loser. No question the new locking code is better. It just frustrates me we can't get something to show that. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: