Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201040444.g044iWH21013@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: LWLock contention: I think I understand the problem (Hannu Krosing <hannu@tm.ee>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Hannu Krosing wrote: > > > Bruce Momjian wrote: > > >Tom Lane wrote: > > > >>Tatsuo Ishii <t-ishii@sra.co.jp> writes: > >> > >>>Ok, here is a pgbench (-s 10) result on an AIX 5L box (4 way). > >>>"7.2 with patch" is for the previous patch. "7.2 with patch (revised)" > >>>is for the this patch. I see virtually no improvement. > >>> > >>If anything, the revised patch seems to make things slightly worse :-(. > >>That agrees with my measurement on a single CPU. > >> > >>I am inclined to use the revised patch anyway, though, because I think > >>it will be less prone to starvation (ie, a process repeatedly being > >>awoken but failing to get the lock). The original form of lwlock.c > >>guaranteed that a writer could not be locked out by large numbers of > >>readers, but I had to abandon that goal in the first version of the > >>patch. The second version still doesn't keep the writer from being > >>blocked by active readers, but it does ensure that readers queued up > >>behind the writer won't be released. Comments? > >> > > > >OK, so now we know that while the new lock code handles the select(1) > >problem better, we also know that on AIX the old select(1) code wasn't > >as bad as we thought. > > > >As to why we don't see better numbers on AIX, we are getting 100tps, > >which seems pretty good to me. Tatsuo, were you expecting higher than > >100tps on that machine? My hardware is at listed at > >http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/hardware.html and I don't get over 16tps. > > > What scaling factor do you use ? > What OS ? > > I got from ~40 tps for -s 128 up to 50-230 tps for -s 1 or 10 on dual > PIII 800 on IDE > disk (Model=IBM-DTLA-307045) with hdparm -t the following Scale 50, transactions 1000, clients 1, 5, 10, 25, 50, all around 15tps. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: