Re: some questions about PostgreSQL in general
От | Jules Alberts |
---|---|
Тема | Re: some questions about PostgreSQL in general |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201031046.g03AkDLs024251@artemis.cuci.nl обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | some questions about PostgreSQL in general ("Jules Alberts" <julesa@arbodienst-limburg.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: some questions about PostgreSQL in general
Re: some questions about PostgreSQL in general |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On 2 Jan 2002 at 21:06, Frank Bax wrote: <snip> > I've got a little script which you can use to create psql tables > directly from the foxpro files (see below). Just ftp the files to *nix > server and run script. Requires DBI abstraction package. thanks, but i think the import will be a clipper applet which will export all data to text, and a COPY to import the lot into postgresql. i can't avoid a step like this because the data in the current tables are encrypted. > >we have decided to go for a complete new platform and after looking > > I use OpenBSD & PHP; no complaints. OpenBSD packages system makes > php/pgsql install very easy. good to hear that openbsd is an option, i hear great things about it's security. OTOH linux is more mainstream, so it should be easier to get support. this choice may become a difficult one... > >let the notebooks make a dial-in connection > > You mean dial-up to internet, right? And come into *nix server via it's > internet connection. yes. and i know, there's _lots_ of security issues involved > >the database should also be able to either hold a lot of office > >documents. > > I'd go with links to files. I once read something to the effect "if you > don't index or search on it, don't include it in db". You could install > SAMBA on *nix box allowing you to "map" drives to SAMBA shares. SAMBA > implements the protocol behind Windows file-sharing. If you need to > search content of these documents, you might consider extracting > readable text out of document and only put that in table. OK, links it is. another question i didn't think about in my original posting: how flexible is postgresql? at the moment it's quite easy to change the structure of the tables. i guess that in postgresql this may be a little problematic. thanks for reacting and HAND -- Jules Alberts
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: