Re: problems with new vacuum (??)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: problems with new vacuum (??) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200201021812.g02IC3q09418@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: problems with new vacuum (??) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote: > Barry Lind <barry@xythos.com> writes: > > But while this vacuum was running the rest of the system was performing > > very poorly. Opperations that usually are subsecond, where taking > > minutes to complete. > > Is this any different from the behavior of 7.1 vacuum? Also, what > platform are you on? > > I've noticed on a Linux 2.4 box (RH 7.2, typical commodity-grade PC > hardware) that vacuum, pgbench, or almost any I/O intensive operation > drives interactive performance into the ground. I have not had an > opportunity to try to characterize the problem, but I suspect Linux's > disk I/O scheduler is not bright enough to prioritize interactive > operations. Just as a data point, I have not seen pgbench dramatically affect performance on BSD/OS. Interactive sessions are just slightly slower when then need to access the disk. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: