Re: appropriate sort_mem & shared buffers
От | Francisco Reyes |
---|---|
Тема | Re: appropriate sort_mem & shared buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011231125357.F2831-100000@zoraida.natserv.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: appropriate sort_mem & shared buffers (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-novice |
On Mon, 31 Dec 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > > I was thinking that the higher the > > buffer size the longer it would take for the database to allocate the > > memory before it can serve the query. > > No. The shared buffers are a static allocation that is made once when > the postmaster starts. The web site is using PHP so a connection is stablished every time. The little I have read little about permanent(persistent?) connections seems so will look into that later. After this is in production I will start looking at the archives of the pgsql-php list to see the current state of php permanent connections. So if PHP is stablishing a new connection every time isn't a new instance of the backend, toghether with the overhead of allocating memory space, been started? On the apache web server one can have a few instances running waiting for requests. Can that be done with pgsql, or does it even make sense to have such arrangement on pgsql?
В списке pgsql-novice по дате отправления: