Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction

Hi all,
 senario:  cursor 1 loop ( e.g. find student id )  cursor 2 loop ( e.g. find courses of this student )   cursor 3 loop
(e.g. update course information )     delele course detail ...     or     delete course detail ... ( same primary key )
    insert course detail ... ( same primary key )   end loop 3  end loop 2 end loop 1
 
 It did 75 delete actions 140 update actions ( delete
and insert ). The process time was about 5-6 minutes
while oracle was 10 seconds to 20 seconds . 

postgresql.conf : 
=================
shared_buffers = 3200
wal_buffers = 80


running on linux 7.1 , 512M ram. 

M.T.




--- Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>
wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, MindTerm wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> >
> >   I will try to assign more memory to shared
> memory,
> > say 50M ~ 100M .
> >
> >   I am runing something like that ..
> >
> >   cursor loop 1
> >    cursor loop 2
> >     cursor loop 3
> >      tmp = primary key
> >      delete tmp ....
> >      insert tmp ....
> >     end loop 3
> >    end loop 2
> >   end loop 3
> >
> > will delete and insert record with same primary
> key
> > within a transaction reduce the performance ?
> 
> Hmm, that might, is the tmp different for each
> combination of 1,2 and 3?  I'm not really sure.
> You might also want to watch the backend's memory
> usage during the call to see how big it gets just
> to make sure there's not something bad happening.
> 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?
> 
> http://archives.postgresql.org


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com