Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
От | MindTerm |
---|---|
Тема | Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011214033428.93468.qmail@web20203.mail.yahoo.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction (Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction
Re: performance tuning in large function / transaction |
Список | pgsql-sql |
Hi all, I will try to assign more memory to shared memory, say 50M ~ 100M . I am runing something like that .. cursor loop 1 cursor loop 2 cursor loop 3 tmp = primary key delete tmp .... insert tmp .... end loop 3 end loop 2 end loop 3 will delete and insert record with same primary key within a transaction reduce the performance ? M.T. --- Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone23.bigpanda.com> wrote: > On Thu, 13 Dec 2001, MindTerm wrote: > > > I am writing a function (plpgsql) which equals > to a > > single transaction transaction in postgresql ( as > I > > known ). So I think that it is not a autocommmit > mode. > > > > I have add following lines in postgresql.conf. > > > > postgresql.conf: > > ==================== > > shared_buffers = 640 > > wal_buffers = 80 > > It depends on how much memory you have, but even 640 > is pretty > low (I think that works out to 5M). Probably a few > thousand > is better if you've got the ram. > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: