Re: INT OR VARCHAR
От | Martín Marqués |
---|---|
Тема | Re: INT OR VARCHAR |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011205211912.5DCC0FA61@bugs.unl.edu.ar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: INT OR VARCHAR ("Aasmund Midttun Godal" <postgresql@envisity.com>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Mié 05 Dic 2001 18:03, Aasmund Midttun Godal wrote: > I am not sure what you are trying to do, but if you have a tree structure > you will have to use an id column e.g.: > > CREATE TABLE domain ( > id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY, > name TEXT CHECK (lower(name) ~ '[a-z0-9]([a-z0-9-]*[a-z0-9])?', > parent INTEGER REFERENCES domain, > UNIQUE (parent, name) > ); > > > If you do not have a tree structure, I would recommend using a natural > primary key in stead of serializing it. Bear in mind though - you should > always have a primary key. I would also recommend creating a couple of > functions to build a fully qualified domain name from the id. No, it's not a tree structure. The question is why not serialize it? I vote for not serializing it because when I get the data from the database, I don't have to join the 2 tables (the domain name is on both tables). CREATE TABLE domain (name CHAR(30) PRIMARY KEY ); CREATE TABLE nodes (id SERIAL,name CHAR(30),domain CHAR(30) REFERENCES domain ("name") ); This is a better approach then putting a SERIAL value to the domain table and making nodes.domain reference to that SERIAL? Why? Saludos... :-) -- Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera, si podés usar PostgreSQL? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués | mmarques@unl.edu.ar Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica Universidad Nacional del Litoral -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: