Re: make query faster??
От | Stephan Szabo |
---|---|
Тема | Re: make query faster?? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011205101538.S16316-100000@megazone23.bigpanda.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: make query faster?? (DI Hasenöhrl <i.hasenoehrl@aon.at>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
On Wed, 5 Dec 2001, [iso-8859-1] DI Hasen�hrl wrote: > Thank you for your response, but I'm not quite clear. > > Is *sort_mem* the same as postgres' starting option -S *Sortsize*, > which is by default 512Kb > At this time I increased sortsize to 1024Kb, but the costs from > explain are the same as before and I can't see, that the query is > faster IIRC the explain costs may not change. If your table really only has 4000 rows, I don't see why it would need to drop off to disk, but while the query is running, you can see if pg_sorttemp* files are being created under your data directory (which would show that it is going out to disk and that you may need to raise -S again). Otherwise, is the data involved something you can share? It might help for us to be able to try it elsewhere to see how it performs. > Please, can you explain, what *cost=341.63..341.63* means It's an estimate of cost. I believe the first is startup cost and the last total cost. You probably want to read the performance tips section of the user's guide.
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: