Re: date_part vs extract
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: date_part vs extract |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200111291914.fATJEPD24332@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: date_part vs extract (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
Список | pgsql-sql |
> Markus Bertheau writes: > > > I wonder about the difference between date_part('week', ...) and > > extract(week from ...) not only but also from a performance point of > > view. I read extract is standard and date_part is not. Backwards > > compatibility maybe justifies the existence of date_part. Whats else? > > I think date_part() was adapted from Ingres. Btw., note that the "week" > parameter (and most others) aren't standard either. Yes, from Ingres. I think Thomas added it. Both he and I have Ingres experience. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-sql по дате отправления: