Re: JDBC bug?
От | Ross J. Reedstrom |
---|---|
Тема | Re: JDBC bug? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011126155831.C5801@rice.edu обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: JDBC bug? (Nate Gelbard <gelbardn@tripwire.com>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2001 at 01:02:53PM -0800, Nate Gelbard wrote: > > > of a complaint on how SQL is case insensitive and if you have created > > your objects with quoted mixed case identifiers you need to accessthem > > via quoted mixed case identifiers. I haven't seen any evidence that > > I am mistaken. This is actually a bug in the applications that are > building SQL statements without quotes around tablenames of mixedcase. Bad apps are everywhere. I've met quite a few that make the Oracle assumption about casefolding: MixedCase == MIXEDCASE i.e. Oracle upcases everything. The other place you'll hit this is NTFS (i.e. NT file system): names are casepresevering but _not_ case sensitive, so MixEdCase == MIXEDCASE == mixecase all conflict, but will be stored (and returned) however the app. (or user) spelled it the first time. Another example of being overly helpful. Ross
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: