Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200111242219.fAOMJ8E10396@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Call for objections: deprecate postmaster -o switch?
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Yes, now I remember. Do we support long command-line options on all > > platforms? I don't think so. > > GUC variable assignment works on all platforms. OK, but when we recommend, we had better tell them to start using GUC and not long command-line options _unless_ long options are supported on their platform. Without that, there will be confusion. Of course, now that we are recommending GUC, all the flags become useless. Kind of a circular arguement here. :-) -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: