Re: v7.2b3 packaged, but not announced beyond here yet ...
От | Horst Herb |
---|---|
Тема | Re: v7.2b3 packaged, but not announced beyond here yet ... |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011123231759.24310.qmail@gnumed.dhs.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: v7.2b3 packaged, but not announced beyond here yet ... (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
RPMs and regression tests (was Re: v7.2b3 packaged...)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Saturday 24 November 2001 03:08, Tom Lane wrote: > In reality, it's extremely questionable that the regression tests > will tell anything useful to a person who's installing prebuilt > platform-specific binaries. The builder of the binaries should have > run the regress tests. So I'm not sure what the point is --- but I am > sure that this setup will cause a lot more problems than it solves. > I recommend forgetting about postgresql-test. Tom, I have problems interpreting your statement. I assumed that the purpose of a regression test is to verify that software is doing what it is supposed to do on the system it as installed. If I install a binary package, you say that I cannot rely on the regression test? What does the builder of the package know about the particularities of my system? How else could I verify the functionality of the installed software? Either the regression test is construed in a way that it works with any installation, or users should be advised NOT to use binary packages at all and only install in a way that they can verify the installation with the regression test. How would you think any user would trust his/her installation in a production environment otherwise? Did I misunderstand your statement or is my trust in PostgreSQL binary installations unjustified? Horst
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: