Re: beta3
От | Martín Marqués |
---|---|
Тема | Re: beta3 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011120225115.DF4422AB3F@bugs.unl.edu.ar обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: beta3 (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mar 20 Nov 2001 12:16, Tom Lane wrote: > > As an experiment, I zipped my current PG source tree with both. (This > isn't an exact test of the distribution size, because I didn't bother > to get rid of the CVS control files, but it's pretty close.) > > Original tar file: 37089280 bytes > gzip -9: 8183182 bytes > bzip2: 6762638 bytes > > or slightly less than a 20% savings for bzip over gzip. That's useful, > but not exactly compelling. A comparison of unzip runtime also seems > relevant: > > $ time gunzip pgsql.tar.gz > > real 0m5.48s > user 0m4.46s > sys 0m0.62s > > $ time bunzip2 pgsql.tar.bz2 > > real 0m27.77s > user 0m26.50s > sys 0m0.92s > > If I'd downloaded this thing over a decent DSL or cable modem line, > bzip2 would actually be a net loss in total download + uncompress time. That would be if I have a decent DSL or cable modem. We have a dedicated line of 756 kb, but we also have 3000 users. Maybe postgreSQL isn't that big, but Mozilla or KDE are, and waiting for la large download isn't what I recommend for an internet experience. :-) > <editorial> > The reason bzip is still an also-ran is that it's not enough better > than gzip to have persuaded people to switch over. My bet is that > bzip will always be an also-ran, and that gzip will remain the de > facto standard until something comes along that's really significantly > better, like a factor of 2 better. I've watched this sort of game > play out before, and I know you don't take over the world with a 20% > improvement over the existing standard. At least not without other > compelling reasons, like speed (oops) or patent freedom (no win there > either). > </editorial> I think it comes to what CPU I'm using. If I'm on an old Pentium, I may not be happy seeing unbzip2 grabbing all my CPU, but if I'm on a last generation PIV of, lets say 1000Mhz, I may not feel it. Saludos... :-) -- Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera, si podés usar PostgreSQL? ----------------------------------------------------------------- Martín Marqués | mmarques@unl.edu.ar Programador, Administrador, DBA | Centro de Telematica Universidad Nacional del Litoral -----------------------------------------------------------------
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: