Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
От | Karel Zak |
---|---|
Тема | Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011120101224.C15164@zf.jcu.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: OCTET_LENGTH is wrong
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Nov 19, 2001 at 02:34:56PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote: > Summary: > > There have been three ideas of what octet_length() sould return: > > 1) compressed on-disk storage length > 2) byte length in server-side encoding > 3) byte length in client-side encoding Very nice is possibility of choice... What add everything: octet_length_storage() octet_length_server() octet_length_client()and problem of right choice put to user. And thestandard octet_length() make as alias to 1) or 2) or 3) -- depend on result of this discussion. > The open question is whether we should be doing #3. If you want to use > octet_length to allocate space on the client side, #3 is really the If Tom needs be sure, he can uses octet_length_client(). > proper value, as Tom has argued. Tatsuo is happy with #2. ...and Tatsuo can uses octet_length_server(). The important thing is that both will still happy :-) Karel -- Karel Zak <zakkr@zf.jcu.cz>http://home.zf.jcu.cz/~zakkr/C, PostgreSQL, PHP, WWW, http://docs.linux.cz, http://mape.jcu.cz
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: