Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200111170211.fAH2BOT16046@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance) (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: TOAST performance (was Re: [GENERAL] Delete Performance)
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > > Is it because we take a snapshot of the page before we write it in case > > we only write part of the page? > > AFAIR, the partial-page-write problem is the entire reason for doing it. > If we could be certain that writes to datafile pages were atomic, we'd > not need this. > > Of course we can't be certain of that. But I'm wondering if there isn't > a cheaper solution. Could we add code to detect a partial write when we recover from one using WAL so we can know if these partial writes are ever happening? I am with you on this. There has to be a better way. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania19026
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: