Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well) |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200111150226.fAF2Q5M28951@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Open Items (was: RE: [HACKERS] Beta going well)
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
> > > The check for int64 and uint64 has to be separated, my AIX > > > has: int8, int16, int32, int64 > > > but not: uint8, uint16, uint32, uint64 > > > > This would be an incremental patch to Peter's, but as I said I have not > > been able to check configure itself. (The rest works, needless to say) > > I am actually very suspicious whether the configure trick > > AC_CHECK_SIZEOF(int8, 0) will work, because they only get defined > > with _ALL_SOURCE defined and inttypes.h included. > > > > Previous patch included just in case. > > Tatsuo would you be so kind as to check this, that would be great ? > > Peter's patches could not be applied to the current and I cannot test > your patches too. > > [t-ishii@srapc1474 pgsql]$ patch -b -p2 < ~/int8-patch > missing header for context diff at line 3 of patch > patching file configure.in > patching file src/include/pg_config.h.in > patching file src/include/c.h > Hunk #1 FAILED at 204. > Hunk #2 FAILED at 216. > Hunk #3 FAILED at 266. > 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/include/c.h.rej My guess is that pgindent has modified c.h. Tatsuo, if you send me the patch, I will manually apply it to current CVS and send you a new version of the patch for testing. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: