Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200111091849.fA9InOP10807@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@fourpalms.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
|
Список | pgsql-patches |
> One possibility would be to put better comments into gram.y, and to back > those comments up with a validation script that *could* generate > keyword.c and other cross references. A bit more structure to the > comments and code would enable that I think. A validation script is a good intermediate idea, similar to our duplicate_oids we have in include/catalog. It would make sure keywords.c was sorted, and make sure each keyword appeared somewhere in lists of allowed function/column name productions. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: