Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200111090205.fA9257H06667@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Call for objections: revision of keyword classification (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification
Re: Call for objections: revision of keyword classification |
Список | pgsql-patches |
Seems fine to apply. It would be nice if we had a more general system for adding keywords and having them be column label/function name capable. Right now I know I need to add to keyword.c but I have no idea if/when I need to add to the keyword list in gram.y. Can we move the keywords out into another file and somehow pull them into gram.y with the proper attributes so they get into all the places they need to be with little fiddling? --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Since we've already seen two complaints about "timestamp" no longer > being an allowed column name in 7.2, I think it's probably time to > make a serious effort at trimming the reserved-word list a little. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления: