Re: Disable Transaction - plans ?
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200110250441.f9P4fa022126@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Disable Transaction - plans ? (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
> > Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com> writes: > > > In fact, some could argue that the default behavior of PostgreSQL > > > should be changed (or at least have an option) to behave like > > > Oracle, where a transaction is implicitly begun at the first > > > encounter of an INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE - or in PostgreSQL's case, the > > > first submitted statement. > > > > If we put in an implicit BEGIN at the start of a connection, when > > does it get committed? We certainly dare not do an implicit COMMIT > > when the client disconnects, but without that the change would > > completely break a lot of existing applications. > > > > Personally I'm perfectly happy with the notion that clients who want > > this behavior can send a BEGIN for themselves ... > > In Ingres, you typically do 'SET AUTOCOMMIT ON' and it says that way for > the rest of the session. GUC would have a default setting for > AUTOCOMMIT too. > > There is no plan to change the default, just to allow people to modify > the default. Sorry meant SET AUTOCOMMIT OFF. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: