Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit
От | Bruce Momjian |
---|---|
Тема | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 200110200251.f9K2pF427228@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit (Jochem van Dieten <jochemd@oli.tudelft.nl>) |
Ответы |
Re: To Postgres Devs : Wouldn't changing the select limit
|
Список | pgsql-general |
> If you are confident that LIMIT #,# would never be an official SQL > standard who am I to second guess that ;) I don't see that possibility > anywhere either, but I just wanted to make sure. The possibility that it > might become an official standard is the only objection I had against > deprecating and eventual elimination of that syntax. > > LIMIT # OFFSET # has my vote. One more thing. I have added the code to suggest alternate syntax for LIMIT #,#: test=> select * from pg_class LIMIT 1,1; ERROR: LIMIT #,# syntax no longer supported. Use LIMIT # OFFSET #. If there are other queries that use syntax that frequently fails, I would like to hear about it so we can generate a helpful error message rather than just a generic syntax error. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: