Re: Embedded postgres ?
От | John P. Looney |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Embedded postgres ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 20011015182908.B1539@antefacto.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Embedded postgres ? (Henning Follmann <h.follmann@gmx.de>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On Thu, Oct 11, 2001 at 09:08:51AM -0400, Henning Follmann mentioned: > > I don't know it's architecture too well, though even with a very small > > database, it seems to use a huge number of files, which are all quite > > large, for the small amount of information in it. > Well, this is not for what postgres was designed for. > For embedded systems you are looking for databases that are optimised > for running completely in memory. Also a SQL engine is maybe not well > suited for embedded devices. Well, these days "embedded" means a lot more than 64k of RAM... I was hoping to be able to run a full RDBMS from a RAM disk. Though, postgres seems to have the strange idea of a new file for each update. This seems to chew through disk space. As well as tuning for massive systems, can you tune it to a small system? > Better would be databases like Berley DB or GDBM. They are though not > comparable to RDBMS like postgres, etc... Indeed. We are using TDB at the moment; nice, small...but it doesn't quite support joins or triggers :) John -- _______________________________________ John Looney Chief Scientist a n t e f a c t o t: +353 1 8586004 www.antefacto.com f: +353 1 8586014
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: