FTI Queries and Explain

Hi.

I've been playing with Full Text Indexing for a few days now, and there is
something in the behaviour of the queries that I don't fully understand. I
have set up a little test database that contains sample job adverts (it's the
sample data I had lying around froma different project)

Selecting on 1 field returns results blindingly fast, as one would expect
when indices are used. However, selecting on 2 fields takes forever.

I have done SET ENABLE_SEQSCAN=OFF.

Here's output of explain:

postgres=> explain select jobs.title from jobs, jobs_description_fti,
jobs_title_fti where (jobs_description_fti.string = 'linux' or
jobs_title_fti.string = 'linux') and (jobs_description_fti.id = jobs.oid and
jobs_title_fti.id = jobs.oid);
NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:

Nested Loop  (cost=200000018.60..200000027.18 rows=1 width=48)
  ->  Merge Join  (cost=200000018.60..200000024.31 rows=1 width=32)
        ->  Sort  (cost=100000004.09..100000004.09 rows=75 width=16)
              ->  Seq Scan on jobs_description_fti
(cost=100000000.00..100000001.75 rows=75 width=16)
        ->  Sort  (cost=100000014.51..100000014.51 rows=251 width=16)
              ->  Seq Scan on jobs_title_fti
(cost=100000000.00..100000004.51 rows=251 width=16)
  ->  Index Scan using jobs_description_oid_index on jobs  (cost=0.00..2.01
rows=1 width=16)

EXPLAIN

This means, if I am understanding things correctly, that jobs_description_fti
is scanned with a sequential scan. That would explain the slowness.

Hwever, doing a:

explain select jobs.title from jobs, jobs_description_fti where
(jobs_description_fti.string = 'linux') and (jobs_description_fti.id =
jobs.oid);
NOTICE:  QUERY PLAN:

Nested Loop  (cost=0.00..4.04 rows=1 width=20)
  ->  Index Scan using jobs_description_fti_index on jobs_description_fti
(cost=0.00..2.01 rows=1 width=4)
  ->  Index Scan using jobs_description_oid_index on jobs  (cost=0.00..2.01
rows=1 width=16)

yields lightning fast results, as one would expect. Why does selecting from
two fields on an "or" basis cause both scans to be sequential? Even when
sequential scans are "disabled"? Because of the breakdown of descriptions
into thousands of lookup rows in the FTI tables, this is actually slower than
doing an index-less "ILIKE" search on both of the fields because of the huge
number of records in the lookup tables...

Can anyone suggest a way to do a two field "or" match using the FTI and
indices?

Cheers.

Gordan