Re: Missing inserts

On Mié 03 Oct 2001 16:43, you wrote:
> On Mar 02 Oct 2001 21:59, you wrote:
> > In 7.1.X and earlier the INSERT rules are executed _before_ the INSERT.
> > This is changed to _after_ in 7.2.
>
> This would mean...??? I haven´t had much trouble until now, so I can´t
> understand why one of the 4 inserts of the rule didn´t get through.

Sorry for answering my own mail, but I found some info.

This is my rule:

CREATE RULE admin_insert AS ON 
INSERT TO admin_view
DO INSTEAD (  INSERT INTO carrera   (carrera,titulo,area,descripcion,incumbencia,director,
matricula,cupos,informes,nivel,requisitos,duracion, categoria)  VALUES
(new.carrera,new.titulo,new.id_subarea,new.descripcion, new.incumbencia,new.director,new.matricula,new.cupos,
new.informes,new.nivel,new.requisitos,new.duracion, new.car_categ);
 
  INSERT INTO inscripcion  (carrera,fecha_ini,fecha_fin,lugar)  VALUES
(currval('carrera_id_curso_seq'),new.fecha_ini,new.fecha_fin, new.lugar);
 
  INSERT INTO resol  (carr,numero,year,fecha)  VALUES
(currval('carrera_id_curso_seq'),new.numero,new.year,new.fecha);
  INSERT INTO log_carrera (accion,tabla,id_col) VALUES   ('I','carrera',currval('carrera_id_curso_seq'));
);

All inserts to the tables are done to the view (so this rule is used), but I 
have 39 of a total of 142 inserts that didn't get the second insert of the 
rule to go.

The question is why is this happening, and how can I fix it?

If you need logs or something, I have no problem at all.

Saludos... :-)

-- 
Porqué usar una base de datos relacional cualquiera,
si podés usar PostgreSQL?
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Martín Marqués                  |        mmarques@unl.edu.ar
Programador, Administrador, DBA |       Centro de Telematica                      Universidad Nacional
        del Litoral
 
-----------------------------------------------------------------