Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes
| От | Marc G. Fournier |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20011001233901.M77860-100000@mail1.hub.org обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes
Re: [HACKERS] CVS changes |
| Список | pgsql-docs |
On Mon, 1 Oct 2001, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > <li><a href="http://candle.pha.pa.us/main/writings/pgsql/sgml">SGML docs > > > updated every half-hour</a> > > > > Ya know, if I'm required to wait 12 hours for *any* source code build to > > be available to my CVSup'd repository, why should we slap in a bunch of > > short circuits for the docs? And if this is a valuable thing to do, why > > short circuit the docs building procedure I've already got on the main > > machines by pointing the web site off to some other machine? > > > > fwiw, one docs building procedure, either ~thomas's, or ~petere's new > > one, or ~bruce's should be sufficient imho. > > > > Since we all seem to be heading off in different directions, we should > > talk about why that is necessary and try to get headed somewhere > > productively imho. > > I did it because the doc build was down and it was supposedly holding up > beta. I do think we need more frequent doc builds than 24 hours though. Since when doe sa doc build, or docs of any kind, hold up beta? docs are 'fluid' up until a week before release,as they have always been ... last I heard from petere, there were tools that need to be installed, and were installed, ont eh server for the builds ... Peter, did I miss something in that, or was it just waiting for ftp.postgresql.org to be on the new server?
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления: